Critical Finance Review
Editor's Page

The CFR seeks top finance papers, just like the JF, JFE, RFS, and JFQA. It differs in that it prefers more controversial, unusual, and critical papers. It can take chances. The types of paper that maximize the distance between the CFR and the other journals are

  • papers that point out that previous papers and/or literatures are wrong;
  • papers that are considered correct but obvious by half of the profession and obviously incorrect by the other half;
  • papers that upset half the profession.
Due to its goals, the CFR is somewhat different. First, its focus is relatively more tilted towards empirical papers. Second, it is not difficult to write a straightforward paper that has a good chance to be accepted into the CFR. The CFR would welcome good and competent critiques of papers from this document. Third, it can provide quick presubmission editorial feedback regarding interest in a manuscript. For more information refer to authors/.

Great News: Elsevier's scientific citation site SCOPUS has accepted the CFR into its set of journals. Thomson's scientific citation site webofscience is likely not far behind. Typically, these sites backfill earlier volumes upon publication, too.

2012, Vol 1

2017, Vol 6-1

2017, Vol 6-2

Forthcoming Papers

2018 and Beyond --- Cite as Volume 7+ for now

Liquidity: Replications, Extensions, and Critique (2018, Vol 8-?)

The CFR has invited replications of the three most influential liquidity papers of the last 20 years (RFP Liquidity call). The papers and lead authors will be

Chase Deehan has agreed to publish documented replicating R code.

Future Replication Possibilities (incl. currently influential paper reference)

This website is also available in encrypted https://cfr.ivo-welch.info form in case you are paranoid.